Rodger Hanson v. Dr. Robert Owen
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [999945065-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03078-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency . Mailed to: Rodger Hanson. [16-6915]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff – Appellant,
DR. ROBERT OWENS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03078-D)
December 15, 2016
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodger Hanson, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan Douglas Childs,
Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Rodger Hanson appeals the district court’s orders granting
Defendant’s motions for summary judgment in this civil rights
action, denying Hanson’s motion to appoint counsel, and denying
his motion to compel discovery.
find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we deny Hanson’s motion
to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Hanson v. Owens, No. 5:14-ct-03078-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9,
2014; Feb. 10, 2015; Oct. 16, 2015; June 20, 2016).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?