US v. Kendall Blue

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cr-00135-D-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999975570]. Mailed to: Kendall Ladell Blue. [16-6916]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6916 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6916 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENDALL LADELL BLUE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (7:11-cr-00135-D-1) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, November 28, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kendall Ladell Blue, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Jason Cameron, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6916 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kendall Ladell Blue appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, in which Blue sought a reduction of his 252-month sentence based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court’s decision under § 3583(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blue, No. 7:11-cr-00135-D-1 (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2016). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?