US v. Kendall Blue
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cr-00135-D-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999975570]. Mailed to: Kendall Ladell Blue. [16-6916]
Appeal: 16-6916
Doc: 10
Filed: 11/28/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6916
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENDALL LADELL BLUE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (7:11-cr-00135-D-1)
Submitted:
November 22, 2016
Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
November 28, 2016
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendall Ladell Blue, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Jason Cameron,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6916
Doc: 10
Filed: 11/28/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kendall
Ladell
Blue
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, in which Blue
sought a reduction of his 252-month sentence based on Amendment
782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
See United States v. Mann,
709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court’s
decision
under
§ 3583(c)(2)
for
abuse
of
discretion).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
United States v. Blue, No. 7:11-cr-00135-D-1 (E.D.N.C.
June 13, 2016).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?