US v. James Palmer

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999894332-2]. Originating case number: 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000016514]. [16-6918]

Appeal: 16-6918

Doc: 16

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6918

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JAMES EDDIE PALMER,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2)

Submitted:

January 6, 2017

Decided:

February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Dennis Harmon, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant.
Andrew Curtis Bosse, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker,
Assistant United States Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6918

Doc: 16

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James

Eddie

Palmer

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant
to

U.S.

Sentencing

Guidelines

Manual

§ 5G1.3(b).

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28,
2016).
dispense

We

deny

with

contentions

are

the

oral

motion
argument

adequately

for

appointment

because

presented

in

the
the

of

counsel

and

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2