Mark Jones v. Dr. Butler

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999896523-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00316-MSD-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999975543]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-6939]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6939 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6939 MARK JACOB JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. BUTLER, M.D.; DR. GRAHAM, M.D., Defendants – Appellees, and WESTERN TIDEWATER REGIONAL JAIL; MEDICAL STAFF; FOOD KITCHEN STAFF; KEN PEARE; OFFICER BATAKIS; ROBERT ROMENNITI, M.D.; SUPERINTENDENT PARHAM; ARAMARK FOODS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00316-MSD-RJK) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. November 28, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Appeal: 16-6939 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Mark Jacob Jones, Appellant Pro Se. NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Appellees. Jonathan Lewis Stone, Beach, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-6939 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Mark Jacob Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Butler, No. 2:15-cv-00316-MSD-RJK (E.D. Va. June 30, 2016). We deny Jones’ motion to appoint counsel, and we dispense with oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?