Anthony Bussie v. Judge Keenan
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00238-RAJ-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999973203].. [16-6943]
Appeal: 16-6943
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6943
ANTHONY BUSSIE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE KEENAN; JUDGE FLOYD; JUDGE HARRIS; JUDGE BRITT; JUDGE
BUMB,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:16-cv-00238-RAJ-RJK)
Submitted:
November 17, 2016
Decided:
November 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Bussie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6943
Doc: 8
Filed: 11/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Bussie seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of mandamus
for failure to allege sufficient facts in support of his petition.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders.
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because
the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied
by filing an amended petition, we conclude that the order Bussie
seeks
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
interlocutory or collateral order.
order
nor
an
appealable
See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal
Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th
Cir. 1993).
jurisdiction
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of
and
remand
the
case
to
the
district
instructions to allow Bussie to amend his petition.
807 F.3d at 630.
court
with
See Goode,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?