Hiram Lopez v. Timothy Stewart


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999929177-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02747-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990498]. Mailed to: Hiram Lopez and Katherine Day. [16-6947]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6947 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6947 HIRAM LOPEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART; LIEUTENANT MARK LATHROP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02747-RDB) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hiram Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Ann Koch, Assistant United States Attorney, Katherine Anne Day, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6947 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Hiram Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm court. we record we for and grant the find leave reasons no to stated reversible proceed by the in error. forma district Lopez v. Stewart, No. 1:15-cv-02747-RDB (D. Md. filed June 14, 2016; entered June 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?