Hiram Lopez v. Timothy Stewart
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999929177-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02747-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990498]. Mailed to: Hiram Lopez and Katherine Day. [16-6947]
Appeal: 16-6947
Doc: 15
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6947
HIRAM LOPEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART; LIEUTENANT MARK LATHROP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-02747-RDB)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hiram Lopez, Appellant Pro Se.
Rebecca Ann Koch, Assistant
United States Attorney, Katherine Anne Day, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6947
Doc: 15
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Hiram
Lopez
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We
have
reviewed
the
Accordingly,
although
pauperis,
affirm
court.
we
record
we
for
and
grant
the
find
leave
reasons
no
to
stated
reversible
proceed
by
the
in
error.
forma
district
Lopez v. Stewart, No. 1:15-cv-02747-RDB (D. Md. filed
June 14, 2016; entered June 15, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?