US v. Albury Franci


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:01-cr-00094-BO-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Jonathan Philip Holbrook, Albury Francis FCI HAZELTON FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 5000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525 [1000090071]. [16-6963]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6963 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/30/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6963 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALBURY FRANCIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00094-BO-1) Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albury Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Philip Holbrook, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ethan A. Ontjes, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6963 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/30/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Albury Francis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Francis, No. 5:01-cr-00094-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed June 22, 2016 & entered June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?