Javon Stephenson v. Gary Davenport

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00266-TSE-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000002610].. [16-6977]

Appeal: 16-6977

Doc: 16

Filed: 01/12/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6977

JAVON STEPHENSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GARY DAVENPORT, Corporal; PAUL BRANNON, Deputy; MS. PURDIE,
Health Department Administrator,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
Z. DIGGS, Classification Department Deputy; KATHY VARGAS,
Lieutenant; SGT. GREER, ranking officer in the Personnel
and Standards Office; ABDUL JAMALUDEEN, Doctor; KEN STOLLE,
Sheriff; L. WILLIAMS, Grievance Department Deputy; SGT.
BENDILY, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office Sgt.; D. MOORE,
Sgt.; CORPORAL WINN, in supervisory charge of Defendant
Wilson; CORPORAL BEAVERS, D-Team Officer; SGT. BISHOP, DTeam officer; JESSICA WILSON, facility law librarian; THE
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, Municipality,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00266-TSE-IDD)

Submitted:

January 5, 2017

Decided:

January 12, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Appeal: 16-6977

Doc: 16

Filed: 01/12/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Javon Stephenson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen,
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

PENDER

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

&

Appeal: 16-6977

Doc: 16

Filed: 01/12/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Javon
granting
relief

Stephenson

defendants’

on

his

42

appeals

motion

U.S.C.

the

for

§ 1983

district

summary
(2012)

court’s

judgment

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we

affirm

Stephenson

for
v.

the

Davenport,

June 30, 2016).
facts

and

materials

reasons

legal
before

No.

stated

by

and

the

order
denying

We

have

Accordingly,

district

1:14-cv-00266-TSE-IDD

court.

(E.D.

Va.

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3