Javon Stephenson v. Gary Davenport


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00266-TSE-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000002610].. [16-6977]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6977 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/12/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6977 JAVON STEPHENSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GARY DAVENPORT, Corporal; PAUL BRANNON, Deputy; MS. PURDIE, Health Department Administrator, Defendants – Appellees, and Z. DIGGS, Classification Department Deputy; KATHY VARGAS, Lieutenant; SGT. GREER, ranking officer in the Personnel and Standards Office; ABDUL JAMALUDEEN, Doctor; KEN STOLLE, Sheriff; L. WILLIAMS, Grievance Department Deputy; SGT. BENDILY, Virginia Beach Sheriff's Office Sgt.; D. MOORE, Sgt.; CORPORAL WINN, in supervisory charge of Defendant Wilson; CORPORAL BEAVERS, D-Team Officer; SGT. BISHOP, DTeam officer; JESSICA WILSON, facility law librarian; THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, Municipality, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00266-TSE-IDD) Submitted: January 5, 2017 Decided: January 12, 2017 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Appeal: 16-6977 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/12/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Javon Stephenson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. PENDER Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 & Appeal: 16-6977 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/12/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Javon granting relief Stephenson defendants’ on his 42 appeals motion U.S.C. the for § 1983 district summary (2012) court’s judgment complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm Stephenson for v. the Davenport, June 30, 2016). facts and materials reasons legal before No. stated by and the order denying We have Accordingly, district 1:14-cv-00266-TSE-IDD court. (E.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?