Shan Carter v. Carlton Joyner
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999898620-2]. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02107-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Shan Carter. [16-6996]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
SHAN EDWARD CARTER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02107-D)
December 15, 2016
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shan Edward Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
dismissing without prejudice Carter’s motion to appoint counsel
for his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition that had not yet been
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
Carter v. Joyner, No. 5:16-hc-02107-D (E.D.N.C. June 28,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?