Shan Carter v. Carlton Joyner
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999898620-2]. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02107-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999990513]. Mailed to: Shan Carter. [16-6996]
Appeal: 16-6996
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6996
SHAN EDWARD CARTER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
CARLTON JOYNER,
Carolina,
Warden,
Central
Prison,
Raleigh,
North
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02107-D)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shan Edward Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6996
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Shan
Edward
Carter
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing without prejudice Carter’s motion to appoint counsel
for his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition that had not yet been
filed.
We
error.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Carter v. Joyner, No. 5:16-hc-02107-D (E.D.N.C. June 28,
2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?