Johnny Ollis v. Litonya Carter

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03248-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999976676]. Mailed to: Johnny Calvin Ollis. [16-6997]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6997 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6997 JOHNNY CALVIN OLLIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LITONYA CARTER; GEORGE SOLOMON; KAREN BROWN; FAYE DANIELS; DALE ATTAWAY; BRENDA DIXON; MAGOLEEN WILLIAMS; JERMAINE HACKNEY; GARY PALUSH, Defendants – Appellees, and DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION, Department of Public Safety, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03248-BO) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Calvin Ollis, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6997 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Johnny dismissing (2012), Calvin his the Ollis complaint appeals Act, for district filed pursuant with Disabilities Americans Rehabilitation the failure to state to a court’s 42 affirm for the reasons stated by the U.S.C. § 1983 Act, and the We have claim. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we order Accordingly, district court. Ollis v. Carter, No. 5:14-ct-03248-BO (E.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?