Gregory Dean Melvin v. Brad Perritt

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999912934-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999961303-2] Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03272-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999975635]. Mailed to: Gregory Dean Melvin 402 A Cokey Road Rocky Mount, NC 27801. [16-6999]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6999 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6999 GREGORY DEAN MELVIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent, Lumberton Correctional; THEODORE BANKS, Programer/Rec Clerk Supervisor; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03272-FL) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, November 28, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Dean Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6999 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Dean Melvin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed Accordingly, the record although we and grant find no reversible leave to proceed We error. in forma pauperis, we deny Melvin’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perritt, No. dispense with contentions 5:15-ct-03272-FL are oral argument adequately (E.D.N.C. because presented in June the the Melvin v. 17, 2016). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?