Demetrius Green v. Ms. Caper

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-00126-DCN-JDA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999929928]. Mailed to: Demetrius Green. [16-7007]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7007 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7007 DEMETRIUS L. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. CAPERS, Jail Administrator; MR. BROOKS, Jail Guard; MS. ELMORE, Jail Guard, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Jacquelyn Denise Austin, Magistrate Judge. (8:16-cv-00126-DCN-JDA) Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demetrius L. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Clifford Rollins, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7007 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/15/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Demetrius L. Green seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s text orders denying his motions to amend his complaint and to compel discovery. over final This court may exercise jurisdiction only orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The text orders Green seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?