US v. Sharu Bey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999973283]. Mailed to: Sharu Bey FCI BUTNER MEDIUM I SATELLITE CAMP P. O. Box 1000 Butner, NC 27509-0000. [16-7008]
Appeal: 16-7008
Doc: 6
Filed: 11/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SHARU BEY, a/k/a Jeffrey Lewis,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2)
Submitted:
November 17, 2016
Decided:
November 22, 2016
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United
States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7008
Doc: 6
Filed: 11/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sharu Bey appeals the district court’s text order denying
his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
United States v. Bey, No.
3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2016).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?