US v. Sharu Bey

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999973283]. Mailed to: Sharu Bey FCI BUTNER MEDIUM I SATELLITE CAMP P. O. Box 1000 Butner, NC 27509-0000. [16-7008]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7008 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7008 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SHARU BEY, a/k/a Jeffrey Lewis, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7008 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Sharu Bey appeals the district court’s text order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the United States v. Bey, No. 3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?