US v. Maurice Hardy

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087919]. Mailed to: Maurice Hardy. [16-7011]

Appeal: 16-7011

Doc: 10

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MAURICE HARDY, a/k/a Reece,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2)

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Marie Celeste, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Peter Jeffrey Martinez, Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7011

Doc: 10

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Maurice Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United
States v. May,

F.3d

,

, No. 15-7912, 2017 WL 1479288, at *4-5 (4th Cir. Apr. 25,

2017). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. Hardy, No. 1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2 (D. Md. July 12, 2016 & July 28, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

2