US v. Marquis Nelson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00058-1,1:15-cv-13059 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999949545]. Mailed to: Marquis Nelson. [16-7022]

Appeal: 16-7022

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/18/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARQUIS ANTHONY NELSON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Irene C. Berger, District
Judge. (1:08-cr-00058-1; 1:15-cv-13059)

Submitted:

October 13, 2016

Decided:

October 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marquis Anthony Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.
John Lanier File,
Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; Steven
Loew, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7022

Doc: 10

Filed: 10/18/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Marquis Anthony Nelson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

However, we affirm as

modified to reflect that Nelson’s motion is dismissed without
prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

See United States v. Modanlo,

762 F.3d 403, 408 (4th Cir. 2014) (holding that “district court
does not regain jurisdiction until the issuance of the mandate by
the clerk of the court of appeals” (internal quotation marks
omitted)).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

2