William McGurgan v. Warden


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999906921-3]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999938976-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999914639-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00111-IMK-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999987446]. Mailed to: William McGurgan ST. MARYS CORRECTIONAL CENTER 2880 North Pleasants Highway St. Marys, WV 26170-0000, Laura Young. [16-7028]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7028 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/15/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7028 WILLIAM MCGURGAN, Petitioner – Appellant, v. WARDEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Robert W. Twomble, Magistrate Judge. (1:16-cv-00111-IMK-RWT) Submitted: November 28, 2016 Decided: December 15, 2016 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William McGurgan, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Young, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7028 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/15/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William McGurgan appeals the order of the magistrate judge denying as moot his motion prepayment of fees. reversible error. for leave pauperis is granted. materials legal before without Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated McGurgan v. Warden, No. 1:16-cv-00111- IMK-RWT (N.D.W. Va. July 20, 2016). and proceed We have reviewed the record and find no by the district court. facts to Leave to proceed in forma We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument decisional process. court presented would not in the aid the The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?