William McGurgan v. Warden
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999906921-3]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999938976-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999914639-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00111-IMK-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999987446]. Mailed to: William McGurgan ST. MARYS CORRECTIONAL CENTER 2880 North Pleasants Highway St. Marys, WV 26170-0000, Laura Young. [16-7028]
Appeal: 16-7028
Doc: 14
Filed: 12/15/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7028
WILLIAM MCGURGAN,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Robert W. Twomble,
Magistrate Judge. (1:16-cv-00111-IMK-RWT)
Submitted:
November 28, 2016
Decided:
December 15, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William McGurgan, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Young, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7028
Doc: 14
Filed: 12/15/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William McGurgan appeals the order of the magistrate judge
denying
as
moot
his
motion
prepayment of fees.
reversible error.
for
leave
pauperis is granted.
materials
legal
before
without
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
McGurgan v. Warden, No. 1:16-cv-00111-
IMK-RWT (N.D.W. Va. July 20, 2016).
and
proceed
We have reviewed the record and find no
by the district court.
facts
to
Leave to proceed in forma
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
decisional process.
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
The motion for appointment of counsel is
denied.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?