US v. Wyaketta Welch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2, 2:16-cv-00316-RBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999992621]. Mailed to: Wyaketta Latoya Welch. [16-7032]

Appeal: 16-7032

Doc: 10

Filed: 12/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7032

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WYAKETTA LATOYA WELCH,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2; 2:16-cv-00316-RBS)

Submitted:

December 20, 2016

Decided:

December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wyaketta Latoya Welch, Appellant Pro Se.
Alyssa Kate Nichol,
Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7032

Doc: 10

Filed: 12/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wyaketta Latoya Welch seeks to appeal the district court’s
order

directing

her

to

show

cause

why

her

28

U.S.C.

(2012) motion should not be dismissed as untimely.
may

exercise

jurisdiction

only

over

final

orders,

§ 2255

This court
28

U.S.C.

§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28

U.S.C.

§ 1292

(2012);

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

54(b);

Cohen

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

v.
The

order Welch seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2