US v. Wyaketta Welch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2, 2:16-cv-00316-RBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999992621]. Mailed to: Wyaketta Latoya Welch. [16-7032]
Appeal: 16-7032
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7032
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WYAKETTA LATOYA WELCH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2; 2:16-cv-00316-RBS)
Submitted:
December 20, 2016
Decided:
December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wyaketta Latoya Welch, Appellant Pro Se.
Alyssa Kate Nichol,
Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7032
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Wyaketta Latoya Welch seeks to appeal the district court’s
order
directing
her
to
show
cause
why
her
28
U.S.C.
(2012) motion should not be dismissed as untimely.
may
exercise
jurisdiction
only
over
final
orders,
§ 2255
This court
28
U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292
(2012);
Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
54(b);
Cohen
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
v.
The
order Welch seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?