US v. Wyaketta Welch


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2, 2:16-cv-00316-RBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999992621]. Mailed to: Wyaketta Latoya Welch. [16-7032]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7032 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7032 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WYAKETTA LATOYA WELCH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:11-cr-00064-RBS-TEM-2; 2:16-cv-00316-RBS) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wyaketta Latoya Welch, Appellant Pro Se. Alyssa Kate Nichol, Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7032 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Wyaketta Latoya Welch seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing her to show cause why her 28 U.S.C. (2012) motion should not be dismissed as untimely. may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, § 2255 This court 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). v. The order Welch seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before Accordingly, we We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?