Burnice Hinnant, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
Filing
OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02283-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. Mailed to: Appellant. [999990410] [16-7073]
Appeal: 16-7073
Doc: 8
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7073
BURNICE ANTWON HINNANT, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-hc-02283-FL)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Burnice Antwon Hinnant, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Clarence Joe
DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7073
Doc: 8
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Burnice Antwon Hinnant, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s
order
petition.
denying
relief
on
his
28
U.S.C.
§ 2254
(2012)
The notice of appeal was received in the district
court shortly after expiration of the appeal period.
Because
Hinnant is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of
the
date
it
was
properly
delivered
to
prison
officials
for
mailing to the court.
Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack,
487 U.S. 266 (1988).
The record does not reveal when Hinnant
gave
the
notice
Accordingly,
we
of
appeal
remand
the
to
prison
case
for
officials
the
for
limited
mailing.
purpose
of
allowing the district court to obtain this information from the
parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack.
The record, as
supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further
consideration.
REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?