Michael Greene v. William Sadler

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999915779-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-15723 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000005413]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-7087]

Appeal: 16-7087

Doc: 18

Filed: 01/18/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7087

MICHAEL J. GREENE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM J. SADLER; GEORGE
HUFFMAN; SCOTT A. ASH,

V.

SITLER;

WILLIAM

O.

(BILL)

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-15723)

Submitted:

December 30, 2016

Decided:

January 18, 2017

Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Greene, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7087

Doc: 18

Filed: 01/18/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michael
accepting

J.

the

Greene

appeals

recommendation

of

the

district

the

court’s

magistrate

order

judge

and

dismissing Greene’s complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012).

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised

in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because

Greene’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district

court’s

disposition,

review of the court’s order.

Greene

has

district

court’s

appoint counsel.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

appellate

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,

370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
the

forfeited

judgment.

We

Accordingly, we affirm

deny

Greene’s

motion

to

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2