Michael Greene v. William Sadler
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999915779-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-15723 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000005413]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-7087]
Appeal: 16-7087
Doc: 18
Filed: 01/18/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7087
MICHAEL J. GREENE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM J. SADLER; GEORGE
HUFFMAN; SCOTT A. ASH,
V.
SITLER;
WILLIAM
O.
(BILL)
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-15723)
Submitted:
December 30, 2016
Decided:
January 18, 2017
Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Greene, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7087
Doc: 18
Filed: 01/18/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael
accepting
J.
the
Greene
appeals
recommendation
of
the
district
the
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
dismissing Greene’s complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012).
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because
Greene’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district
court’s
disposition,
review of the court’s order.
Greene
has
district
court’s
appoint counsel.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
appellate
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,
370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
the
forfeited
judgment.
We
Accordingly, we affirm
deny
Greene’s
motion
to
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?