US v. Darryle Robertson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00304-JFM-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999990631]. Mailed to: Darryle Edward Robertson. [16-7101]
Appeal: 16-7101
Doc: 12
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7101
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYLE EDWARD ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge.
(1:01-cr-00304-JFM-3)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryle Edward Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Schenning, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7101
Doc: 12
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Darryle Edward Robertson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2)
Guidelines.
error.
(2012)
and
Amendment
782
to
the
Sentencing
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?