Jessie Frederick v. John MaGill
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:15-cv-03399-HMH. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Jessie Frederick. [16-7105]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
JOHN MAGILL, Director, S.C.D.M.H., in his individual and
official capacity; HOLLY SCATURO, Director - S.V.P.T.P, in
her individual and official capacity; KIMBERLY POHOLCHUK,
Program Coor. S.V.P.T.P., in her individual and official
capacity; WARDEN STEVENSON, Warden, BRCI, in his individual
and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (0:15-cv-03399-HMH)
November 17, 2016
November 22, 2016
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie Frederick, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II,
David Allan DeMasters, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina; Eugene Matthews, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Jessie Frederick seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012).
The magistrate judge recommended
that relief be denied and advised Frederick that the failure to
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Frederick has waived appellate
review by failing to file specific objections after receiving
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?