US v. Donald Lewi
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cr-00068-FL-2. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999990665]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-7113]
Appeal: 16-7113
Doc: 7
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7113
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONALD ELBERT LEWIS, a/k/a Peptone,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (4:12-cr-00068-FL-2)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Elbert Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker,
Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7113
Doc: 7
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Elbert Lewis appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s November
2015 order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for
reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S.
Sentencing Guidelines Manual.
find no reversible error.
court’s order.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm the district
See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234
(4th Cir. 2010) (a district court has no authority to reconsider
its
decision
on
§ 3582(c)(2)).
a
sentence
reduction
motion
under
18
U.S.C.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?