Laquan Simmons v. Cumberland County Municipality


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03317-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999990745]. Mailed to: Laquan Lorenzo Simmons. [16-7123]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7123 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7123 LAQUAN LORENZO SIMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; KELLY THOMPSON; ALLEN ROGERS; MS. ROWE; MS. SLAUGHTER; FRANK L. PERRY; THOMAS ASBELL, DIAMOND; SARAH STALLINGS; MS. Defendants – Appellees, and NORTH CAROLINA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03317-FL) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Laquan Lorenzo Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7123 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Laquan Lorenzo Simmons appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action on 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) review. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. Cir. R. 34(b). challenge the Because basis for Simmons’ the informal district brief court’s See 4th does not disposition, Simmons has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). We Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?