Laquan Simmons v. Cumberland County Municipality
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03317-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999990745]. Mailed to: Laquan Lorenzo Simmons. [16-7123]
Appeal: 16-7123
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7123
LAQUAN LORENZO SIMMONS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
MUNICIPALITY;
KELLY
THOMPSON; ALLEN ROGERS; MS. ROWE; MS.
SLAUGHTER; FRANK L. PERRY; THOMAS ASBELL,
DIAMOND;
SARAH
STALLINGS; MS.
Defendants – Appellees,
and
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03317-FL)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Laquan Lorenzo Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7123
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Laquan Lorenzo Simmons appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action on 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) review.
On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
Cir.
R.
34(b).
challenge
the
Because
basis
for
Simmons’
the
informal
district
brief
court’s
See 4th
does
not
disposition,
Simmons has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir.
2004).
We
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?