US v. Michael E. William


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000001714]. Mailed to: Michael Williams. [16-7134]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7134 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/11/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7134 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1) Submitted: January 5, 2017 Decided: January 11, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7134 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/11/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael granting his E. Williams 18 U.S.C. appeals the § 3582(c)(2) district (2012) court’s motion. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. order We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2016). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?