US v. Michael E. William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000001714]. Mailed to: Michael Williams. [16-7134]

Appeal: 16-7134

Doc: 12

Filed: 01/11/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1)

Submitted:

January 5, 2017

Decided:

January 11, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7134

Doc: 12

Filed: 01/11/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michael
granting

his

E.

Williams

18

U.S.C.

appeals

the

§ 3582(c)(2)

district

(2012)

court’s

motion.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

order

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Williams, No. 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10,
2016).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2