Victor Sanchez Garcia v. B.J. Meek
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-02570-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Victor Sanchez Garcia FCI WILLIAMSBURG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 340 Salters, SC 29590-0000. [16-7146]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
VICTOR SANCHEZ GARCIA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
B. J. MEEKS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (5:16-cv-02570-HMH)
December 15, 2016
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Sanchez Garcia, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Victor Sanchez Garcia appeals the district court’s order
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012).
The magistrate judge recommended that the petition be dismissed
without prejudice and advised Garcia that failure to timely file
specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate
review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
Garcia has waived appellate review
by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?