Kendrick Latham v. C. William


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999933267-2] Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00122-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999949474]. Mailed to: Kendrick Latham FCI GILMER FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 6000 Glenville, WV 26351-0000. [16-7148]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7148 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/18/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7148 KENDRICK LATHAM, Petitioner – Appellant, v. C. WILLIAMS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:15-cv-00122-FPS-JES) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kendrick Latham, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Altmeyer, Virginia; Attorney, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7148 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/18/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kendrick Latham, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s judge order and petition. error. accepting denying relief recommendation on his 28 of the U.S.C. magistrate § 2241 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, court. we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Latham v. Williams, No. 5:15-cv-00122-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. June 28, 2016). facts the and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?