Thomas Stout, Jr. v. Garner Police Department

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike [999980719-2] Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03105-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990877]. Mailed to: T. Stout. [16-7149]

Appeal: 16-7149

Doc: 21

Filed: 12/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7149

THOMAS STOUT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARNER POLICE DEPARTMENT; G. E. WHITE, Garner
Officer; PRESTON M. CHARLES, Garner Police Officer,

Police

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03105-BO)

Submitted:

December 15, 2016

Decided:

December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Stout, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Dan McCord Hartzog,
Katherine Marie Barber-Jones, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7149

Doc: 21

Filed: 12/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Thomas

Stout,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Stout

v.

Garner

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2016).
Stout’s

pro

se

Police

Dep’t,

No.

5:15-ct-03105-BO

We deny Appellees’ motion to strike

supplemental

brief.

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2