Edward Dane Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999949924-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02240-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Edward Dane Jeffus FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 1760 Highway 67 North Carrabelle, FL 32322. [16-7154]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD DANE JEFFUS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief
District Judge. (5:15-hc-02240-D)
January 31, 2017
February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. *
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016).
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
To the extent that Jeffus appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to
prosecute, Jeffus’ claims are rendered moot by the district court’s
thorough consideration of his petition in its subsequent order
denying Jeffus’ Rule 60(b) motion.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?