Edward Dane Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999949924-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02240-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016771]. Mailed to: Edward Dane Jeffus FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 1760 Highway 67 North Carrabelle, FL 32322. [16-7154]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7154 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7154 EDWARD DANE JEFFUS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. S. HOLLEMBAEK, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02240-D) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7154 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. * reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). v. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent that Jeffus appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to prosecute, Jeffus’ claims are rendered moot by the district court’s thorough consideration of his petition in its subsequent order denying Jeffus’ Rule 60(b) motion. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?