Edward Dane Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999949924-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02240-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016771]. Mailed to: Edward Dane Jeffus FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 1760 Highway 67 North Carrabelle, FL 32322. [16-7154]

Appeal: 16-7154

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7154

EDWARD DANE JEFFUS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
S. HOLLEMBAEK,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief
District Judge. (5:15-hc-02240-D)

Submitted:

January 31, 2017

Decided:

February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7154

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. *
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

Jeffus

Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016).

v.
We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

To the extent that Jeffus appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to
prosecute, Jeffus’ claims are rendered moot by the district court’s
thorough consideration of his petition in its subsequent order
denying Jeffus’ Rule 60(b) motion.
2