Kenneth White v. Experian Consumer Fraud
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999974929-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Kenneth White. [16-7158]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff – Appellant,
EXPERIAN CONSUMER FRAUD ASSISTANCE; TRANS UNION CONSUMER;
EQUIFAX CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS; HUNTINGTON MTG COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. John Preston Bailey,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA)
December 15, 2016
December 21, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth White, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph N. Parsons, JONES DAY,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; William R. Brown, Robert J. Schuckit,
SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES PC, Zionsville, Indiana; Vincent M.
Roskovensky, CLARK HILL PLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; John
Joseph Meadows, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, PLLC, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
White v. Experian Consumer Fraud,
No. 1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 15, 2016).
deny White’s motion for default judgment.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?