Kenneth White v. Experian Consumer Fraud


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999974929-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999991674]. Mailed to: Kenneth White. [16-7158]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7158 Doc: 31 Filed: 12/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7158 KENNETH WHITE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. EXPERIAN CONSUMER FRAUD ASSISTANCE; TRANS UNION CONSUMER; EQUIFAX CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS; HUNTINGTON MTG COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 21, 2016 Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth White, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph N. Parsons, JONES DAY, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; William R. Brown, Robert J. Schuckit, SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES PC, Zionsville, Indiana; Vincent M. Roskovensky, CLARK HILL PLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; John Joseph Meadows, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7158 Doc: 31 Filed: 12/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth dismissing White his appeals complaint denying reconsideration. no reversible error. for the district failure to court’s state a orders claim and We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Experian Consumer Fraud, No. 1:16-cv-00049-JPB-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 15, 2016). deny White’s motion for default judgment. We also We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?