US v. Alton B. Couther, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cr-00187-RAJ-TEM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000027939]. Mailed to: Alton Bernard Couther III FCI OTISVILLE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Otisville, NY 10963-0000. [16-7162]

Appeal: 16-7162

Doc: 11

Filed: 02/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7162

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALTON B. COUTHER, III,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cr-00187-RAJ-TEM-1)

Submitted:

February 15, 2017

Before GREGORY,
Judges.

Chief

Judge,

Decided:

and

AGEE

and

February 22, 2017

THACKER,

Circuit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alton B. Couther, III, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7162

Doc: 11

Filed: 02/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Alton B. Couther, III, appeals the district court’s denial
of his motion seeking reconsideration of the district court’s
order

reducing

Couther’s

sentence

and

requesting

reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).
lack

jurisdiction

motions.

legal
before

reconsider

orders

further

District courts

acting

on

§ 3582(c)

See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36

(4th Cir. 2010).
order.

to

a

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2