US v. Clarence Coakley
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:96-cr-00026-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Clarance Coakley. [16-7165]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
CLARENCE D. COAKLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:96-cr-00026-BO-1)
December 15, 2016
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.
Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant
United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).
find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and
See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d
183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) (“[A] defendant who was convicted of a
crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory
Accordingly, we affirm.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?