US v. Clarence Coakley


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:96-cr-00026-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990570]. Mailed to: Clarance Coakley. [16-7165]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7165 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7165 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLARENCE D. COAKLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00026-BO-1) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam. Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7165 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Clarence denying his D. Coakley motion for appeals reduction U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). find no reversible error. the in district sentence court’s pursuant order to 18 We have reviewed the record and See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) (“[A] defendant who was convicted of a crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory minimum sentence § 3582(c)(2).”). is ineligible for Accordingly, we affirm. a reduction under We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?