Jackie Moorehead v. Phillip Stover


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999936609-2]; denying Motion to strike [999936608-2]. Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03144-F. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999990702]. Mailed to: Jackie Moorehead. [16-7172]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7172 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7172 JACKIE EMMITT MOOREHEAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PHILLIP E. STOVER, Defendant – Appellee, and STAFF MEMBERS OF LUMBERTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; PAULA SMITH; RON BELL; LATITIA OWENS; JOHN DOES; MARY DOES, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:13-ct-03144-F) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie Emmitt Moorehead, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 16-7172 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-7172 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Jackie Emmitt Moorehead appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 23, Moorehead v. Stover, No. 5:13-ct-03144-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2016). Moorehead’s motions to strike the defendant’s affidavit and to impose sanctions are denied. We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?