Jackie Moorehead v. Phillip Stover
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999936609-2]; denying Motion to strike [999936608-2]. Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03144-F. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999990702]. Mailed to: Jackie Moorehead. [16-7172]
Appeal: 16-7172
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7172
JACKIE EMMITT MOOREHEAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PHILLIP E. STOVER,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
STAFF MEMBERS OF LUMBERTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; PAULA SMITH; RON BELL;
LATITIA OWENS; JOHN DOES; MARY DOES,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03144-F)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jackie Emmitt Moorehead, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Finarelli,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Appeal: 16-7172
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-7172
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Jackie Emmitt Moorehead appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
23,
Moorehead v. Stover, No. 5:13-ct-03144-F (E.D.N.C. Aug.
2016).
Moorehead’s
motions
to
strike
the
defendant’s
affidavit and to impose sanctions are denied.
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?