Stephen Satcher v. David Wilson
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999928327-2]. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00152-FPS-JES. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Appellant. [16-7180]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Petitioner - Appellant,
DAVID WILSON, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:15-cv-00152-FPS-JES)
January 20, 2017
January 30, 2017
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Satcher, Appellant Pro Se.
Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Tara Noel Tighe, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
district court’s order declining to adopt the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on Satcher’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition.
We have reviewed the record and find no
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.
Satcher v. Wilson, No. 5:15-cv-00152-FPS-
JES (N.D. W. Va. July 29, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?