Michael Anthony Sorbello v. Haywood County Municipality

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999941461-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00274-FDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999975665]. Mailed to: Michael Anthony Sorbello GREENE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 39 Maury, NC 28554-0000. [16-7186]

Appeal: 16-7186

Doc: 14

Filed: 11/28/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7186

MICHAEL ANTHONY SORBELLO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAYWOOD COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; CHARLIE COOK, Public Defender,
Individually and in his Official Capacity; M.A. MCABEE,
Deputy Sheriff with the Haywood County Sheriff’s Office,
Individually and in his Official Capacity; ROB SKIVER,
Police Officer with the Waynesville Police Department,
Individually and in his Official Capacity; N.C. STATE CRIME
LABORATORY, Department of Justice Western; G. BAXTER,
Examiner with the N.C. State Crime Laboratory, Individually
and in his Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-00274-FDW)

Submitted:

November 22, 2016

Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Sorbello, Appellant Pro Se.

November 28, 2016

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Appeal: 16-7186

Doc: 14

Filed: 11/28/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-7186

Doc: 14

Filed: 11/28/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Michael Anthony Sorbello appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
confine

our

brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

brief

does

review

not

to

the

challenge

issues

the

raised

in

On appeal, we

the

Appellant’s

Because Sorbello’s informal

basis

for

the

district

court’s

disposition, Sorbello has waived appellate review of the court’s
order.

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4

(4th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we deny Sorbello’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order.
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3