Kenneth Sweeting v. Doctor Ulep
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motions to compel [999977168-2], [999968780-2]. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00157-AWA-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: K. Sweeting. [16-7199]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
KENNETH DARNIEL SWEETING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
DOCTOR ULEP, Head Nurse; REGISTERED NURSE WOODRUFF; LP NURSE
BALDWIN; NURSE O’NEIL; NURSE BUTTS, (male); NURSE TWEET,
Defendants – Appellees,
T. LYONS, Mental Health Psychologist,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District
December 15, 2016
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Darniel Sweeting, Appellant Pro Se.
Muldowney, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Kenneth Darniel Sweeting appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to
exhaust administrative remedies and the court’s order denying
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Sweeting v. Ulep, No. 2:14-cv-00157-AWA-
RJK (E.D. Va. June 29, 2016 & Aug. 15, 2016).
We deny Sweeting’s
motions to compel and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?