US v. Shane Fell
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:94-cr-00046-H-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Fells. [16-7202]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
SHANE FELLS, a/k/a Quasim Yusef Johnson, a/k/a Q,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (3:94-cr-00046-H-1)
December 20, 2016
December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shane Fells, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Matthew Fesak,
Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Lawrence
Jason Cameron, Shailika S. Kotiya, Joshua Bryan Royster, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Shane Fells appeals the district court’s order granting his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction
under Amendment 782. *
We have reviewed the record and conclude
declining to grant a larger reduction in Fells’ sentence.
(standard of review); see also Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S.
817, 825-27 (2010) (explaining that § 3582(c)(2) proceeding is
not full resentencing); United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193,
States v. Fells, No. 3:94-cr-00046-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2016).
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Although the district court granted Fells’ motion and
sentenced Fells within the reduced amended Guidelines range, the
reduction granted by the court was less than the reduction
sought by Fells.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?