Michael Ferola v. Officer Fulton


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:13-cv-02413-RBH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016733]. Mailed to: Michael J. Ferola. [16-7212]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7212 Doc: 22 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7212 MICHAEL J. FEROLA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER FULTON, Defendant - Appellee, and WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; GREGORY KNOWLIN; KENNETH SHARP; WILLIE EAGLETON; MARIA LEGGINS; JERRY ADGER; MRS BRACKENBERRY; ANN HALLMAN; CAPTAIN ROGERS; LT POWELL; LT BRAYBOY; LT WHEELER; CPL MILLER; CPL CONYERS; MICHAEL BOWERS; MAJOR WEST; ASSOCIATE WARDEN SELLERS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN MCFADDEN; MS GRAVES, IGC, Evans, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (9:13-cv-02413-RBH) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 16-7212 Doc: 22 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Michael J. Ferola, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Arlene Thomas, THOMPSON & HENRY, PA, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-7212 Doc: 22 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Michael J. Ferola filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action asserting claims of denial of access to the courts and failure to protect. judge’s recommendation defendants surviving The district court accepted in part the magistrate on and Ferola’s failure to granted access protect to claim the summary courts against judgment claims. to The Defendant Fulton proceeded to trial and the jury ruled in Fulton’s favor. Ferola appeals the denial of relief on his claims. the record affirm. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we Ferola v. Fulton, No. 9:13-cv-02413-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2015 & Aug. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?