Joseph W. Verrett, Sr. v. General Motors Automotive
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00416-HEH-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Joseph W. Verrett Sr. FAIRFAX COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER 10520 Judicial Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-0000. [16-7214]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH W. VERRETT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
GENERAL MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
March 30, 2017
April 3, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph W. Verrett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
district court by filing an amended complaint stating sufficient
facts to support his claims, the order Verrett seeks to appeal
Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807
F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar
Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
and remand the case to the district court with instructions to
allow Verrett to file an amended complaint.
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?