US v. Lance Tew
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed under CJA [999940056-2] Originating case number: 6:14-cr-00133-HMH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Lance Tew. [16-7215]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
NED L. POLK, SR., Bondsman as to Mary Virginia Merritt;
LANCE C. TEW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:14-cr-00133-HMH-2)
January 17, 2017
January 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lance C. Tew, Appellant
OFFICE OF THE UNITED
Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr.,
STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South
Pg: 2 of 3
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Lance C. Tew appeals the district court’s order denying his
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012).
On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Tew’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Tew has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order.
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,
370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we grant
affirm the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?