US v. Daniel Fountain
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed under CJA [999938995-2]. Originating case number: 8:10-cr-00777-RWT-8. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Appellant. [16-7247]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
DANIEL FOUNTAIN, a/k/a Danny Boy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
January 27, 2017
February 6, 2017
Before SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appellant Pro Se. Deborah
States Attorney, Greenbelt,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Daniel Fountain appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reconsider the district court’s denial of his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
Because the district court
reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief.
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235–36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding
reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion).
We grant Fountain’s
motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?