In re: Calvin Winbush

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999931461-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999939003-2]. Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00021-HEH-1,3:14-cv-00724-HEH-RCY. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000024774]. Mailed to: Calvin Winbush. [16-7253]

Appeal: 16-7253

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/16/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7253

In Re:

CALVIN WINBUSH, a/k/a Good Game,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:12-cr-00021-HEH-1; 3:14-cv-00724-HEH-RCY)

Submitted:

February 7, 2017

Decided:

February 16, 2017

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Winbush, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7253

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/16/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Calvin Winbush petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255

(2012)

motion.

He

seeks

an

directing the district court to act.
court’s

docket

reveals

that

the

order

from

this

court

Our review of the district

district

court

ruled

on

the

§ 2255 motion, denying it and declining to grant a certificate
of appealability.

See United States v. Winbush, No. 3:12-cr-

00021-HEH-RCY-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2016).
that order is pending in this court.
Winbush,

No.

Accordingly,

16-7527
because

(4th
the

Cir.)

district

Winbush’s appeal of
See United States v.

(docketed
court

has

Nov.

recently

Winbush’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
leave

to

proceed

in

forma

pauperis.

We

2,

dispense

2016).
decided
We grant

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2