Leonard Givens v. David Aaron
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion-- Motion to appoint/assign counsel denied [999980506-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00378-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000078054]. Mailed to: Leonard A. Givens. [16-7291]
Appeal: 16-7291
Doc: 14
Filed: 05/09/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7291
LEONARD A. GIVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID AARON; TIMOTHY REYNOLD; JOHN DOE 1-5; LOUIS GRIFFIN;
JOHN HUNT; JAMES BIRD; MATTHEW BOONE; MANUEL ZACCHEUS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DAVID R. MITCHELL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00378-FDW)
Submitted: April 28, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: May 9, 2017
Appeal: 16-7291
Doc: 14
Filed: 05/09/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Leonard A. Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-7291
Doc: 14
Filed: 05/09/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Leonard A. Givens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Aaron, No.
3:14-cv-00378-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2016).
We deny Givens’ motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?