Leonard Givens v. David Aaron


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion-- Motion to appoint/assign counsel denied [999980506-2] Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00378-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000078054]. Mailed to: Leonard A. Givens. [16-7291]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7291 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/09/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7291 LEONARD A. GIVENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID AARON; TIMOTHY REYNOLD; JOHN DOE 1-5; LOUIS GRIFFIN; JOHN HUNT; JAMES BIRD; MATTHEW BOONE; MANUEL ZACCHEUS, Defendants – Appellees, and DAVID R. MITCHELL, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:14-cv-00378-FDW) Submitted: April 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Decided: May 9, 2017 Appeal: 16-7291 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/09/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Leonard A. Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-7291 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/09/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Leonard A. Givens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Aaron, No. 3:14-cv-00378-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2016). We deny Givens’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?