Darron Jones v. Cranford
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999983985-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00028-FDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990708]. Mailed to: Darron Jones. [16-7306]
Appeal: 16-7306
Doc: 19
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7306
DARRON JERMAINE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CRANFORD,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
HARRINGTON; ESTRIDGE; ROBERSON;
HANSON; WARDEN; DYCUS; RIVERA,
SMITH;
YOUNG;
BARRETT;
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00028-FDW)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Vanessa N. Totten,
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
North
Carolina,
for
Appellee.
Appeal: 16-7306
Doc: 19
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-7306
Doc: 19
Filed: 12/20/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant Cranford’s motion to dismiss Jones’ 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action against Cranford.
record and find no reversible error.
the
reasons
stated
by
the
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
district
court.
See
Jones
Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016).
deny Jones’ motion for default judgment.
v.
We
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?