Darron Jones v. Cranford

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999983985-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00028-FDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990708]. Mailed to: Darron Jones. [16-7306]

Appeal: 16-7306

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/20/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7306

DARRON JERMAINE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CRANFORD,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
HARRINGTON; ESTRIDGE; ROBERSON;
HANSON; WARDEN; DYCUS; RIVERA,

SMITH;

YOUNG;

BARRETT;

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00028-FDW)

Submitted:

December 15, 2016

Decided:

December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Vanessa N. Totten,
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
North
Carolina,
for
Appellee.

Appeal: 16-7306

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/20/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-7306

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/20/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant Cranford’s motion to dismiss Jones’ 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action against Cranford.
record and find no reversible error.
the

reasons

stated

by

the

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

district

court.

See

Jones

Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016).
deny Jones’ motion for default judgment.

v.
We

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3