Darron Jones v. Cranford


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999983985-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00028-FDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990708]. Mailed to: Darron Jones. [16-7306]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7306 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7306 DARRON JERMAINE JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CRANFORD, Defendant – Appellee, and HARRINGTON; ESTRIDGE; ROBERSON; HANSON; WARDEN; DYCUS; RIVERA, SMITH; YOUNG; BARRETT; Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00028-FDW) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Appeal: 16-7306 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-7306 Doc: 19 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Cranford’s motion to dismiss Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against Cranford. record and find no reversible error. the reasons stated by the We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for district court. See Jones Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016). deny Jones’ motion for default judgment. v. We We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?