Joseph Coppola v. Terry O'Brien

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00096-GMG-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000097213]. Mailed to: Joseph Coppola. [16-7316, 17-6026]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7316 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/08/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7316 JOSEPH COPPOLA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. No. 17-6026 JOSEPH COPPOLA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00096-GMG-RWT) Submitted: May 30, 2017 Decided: June 8, 2017 Appeal: 16-7316 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/08/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Coppola, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-7316 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/08/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Joseph Coppola, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. Coppola also appeals the court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in either order. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coppola v. O’Brien, No. 3:15-cv-00096-GMG-RWT (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 8, 2016; Dec. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?