US v. Marsha King

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000016480]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-7318]

Appeal: 16-7318

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7318

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARSHA KING,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1)

Submitted:

January 31, 2017

Decided:

February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marsha King, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Westley Haynie,
Assistant United States Attorney, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-7318

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Marsha King appeals the district court’s orders denying her
“Motion To Stay Restitution Until Release From Incarceration and
To Set Schedule Payments for Assessment Fine” and her motion for
reconsideration.

We

have

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
00065-RAJ-DEM-1

(E.D.

dispense

oral

with

contentions

are

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

United States v. King, No. 2:14-crVa.

Sept.

argument

adequately

6

&

Sept.

15,

2016).

the

facts

and

legal

materials

before

because

presented

in

the

We

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2