US v. Marsha King


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000016480]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-7318]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7318 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7318 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARSHA KING, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marsha King, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7318 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Marsha King appeals the district court’s orders denying her “Motion To Stay Restitution Until Release From Incarceration and To Set Schedule Payments for Assessment Fine” and her motion for reconsideration. We have reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 00065-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. dispense oral with contentions are reviewed the record and find no United States v. King, No. 2:14-crVa. Sept. argument adequately 6 & Sept. 15, 2016). the facts and legal materials before because presented in the We this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?