Kalvin Marshall v. Robert Payne
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00286-JRS. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000016684]. Mailed to: Kalvin Marshall. [16-7321]
Appeal: 16-7321
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7321
KALVIN MARSHALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT E. PAYNE, Judge; HENRY E. HUDSON, Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00286-JRS)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7321
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reopen his Bivens * action which was dismissed in
April 2015.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Marshall v. Payne, No. 3:13-cv-00286-JRS (E.D.
Va. Sept. 19, 2016).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?