Kalvin Marshall v. Robert Payne


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00286-JRS. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000016684]. Mailed to: Kalvin Marshall. [16-7321]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7321 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7321 KALVIN MARSHALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT E. PAYNE, Judge; HENRY E. HUDSON, Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-00286-JRS) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7321 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his Bivens * action which was dismissed in April 2015. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Payne, No. 3:13-cv-00286-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 2016). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?