Norman Alan Kerr v. Warden K. Rogers

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999945816-2]; denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999943033-2] Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00278-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999975630]. Mailed to: Christopher Gibbs, Norman Alan Kerr FCI EDGEFIELD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 725 Edgefield, SC 29824-0000. [16-7323]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7323 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7323 NORMAN ALAN KERR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN K. ROGERS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00278-MGL) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, November 28, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman Alan Kerr, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Gibbs, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7323 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Norman Alan Kerr, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s judge order and petition. error. adopting denying the relief recommendation on his 28 of U.S.C. the magistrate § 2241 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kerr v. Rogers, No. 5:16-cv-00278-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016). We deny Kerr’s motion for a certificate of appealability unnecessary transcript at as government and deny expense. We his motion dispense for with a oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?