Matthew Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016488]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-7329]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7329 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7329 MATTHEW WAKEFIELD, In Propria Persona, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Karin Riley Porter, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew Wakefield, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7329 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Matthew Wakefield appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). is We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Va., No. 1:16-cv- 00666-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?