Matthew Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016488]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-7329]
Appeal: 16-7329
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7329
MATTHEW WAKEFIELD, In Propria Persona,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CIRCUIT COURT OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Karin Riley Porter,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Wakefield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7329
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/03/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew
Wakefield
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012).
is
We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal
frivolous.
See
28
U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)
(2012).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Va., No. 1:16-cv-
00666-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?