US v. Daniel Watlington
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:05-cr-00004-F-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Watlington. [16-7347]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
DANIEL WATLINGTON, a/k/a Gator Slim,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-cr-00004-F-1)
January 31, 2017
February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Watlington, Appellant Pro Se.
S. Katherine Burnette,
Joshua Bryan Royster, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment for Addendum
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
United States v. Watlington, No. 5:05-
cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?