US v. Daniel Watlington


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:05-cr-00004-F-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000016753]. Mailed to: Watlington. [16-7347]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7347 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7347 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANIEL WATLINGTON, a/k/a Gator Slim, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cr-00004-F-1) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Watlington, Appellant Pro Se. S. Katherine Burnette, Joshua Bryan Royster, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7347 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Watlington appeals the district court’s order denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment for Addendum Presentence Report.” reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Watlington, No. 5:05- cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?