Michael Newborn v. Stephanie Hollembeak


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999948578-2]. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02040-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999992717]. Mailed to: Michael Newborn. [16-7348]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-7348 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7348 MICHAEL NEWBORN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STEPHANIE HOLLEMBEAK, Warden, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02040-D) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Newborn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-7348 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Newborn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order petition. error. denying on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, court. we affirm Newborn v. Sept. 22, 2016). facts relief and materials legal before for the reasons Hollembeak, No. stated by the 5:16-hc-02040-D district (E.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?