Michael Newborn v. Stephanie Hollembeak
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999948578-2]. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02040-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999992717]. Mailed to: Michael Newborn. [16-7348]
Appeal: 16-7348
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7348
MICHAEL NEWBORN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STEPHANIE HOLLEMBEAK, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02040-D)
Submitted:
December 20, 2016
Decided:
December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Newborn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-7348
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Newborn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s
order
petition.
error.
denying
on
his
28
U.S.C.
§ 2241
(2012)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis,
court.
we
affirm
Newborn
v.
Sept. 22, 2016).
facts
relief
and
materials
legal
before
for
the
reasons
Hollembeak,
No.
stated
by
the
5:16-hc-02040-D
district
(E.D.N.C.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?